A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out amongst future neighbours about the development of the wall at a coastal site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which includes captivated countrywide notice adhering to an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones house at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental considerations, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Instances article about René Collier along with the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has developed right into a very publicised authorized struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around building is effective at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and an organization director respectively, request to create their spouse and children residence. The situation happens to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, exactly where progress pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of proven inhabitants. In accordance with the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming made by their potential neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted underneath scheduling authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally inhabitants of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their scheduling authorization by building a wall beyond the boundaries in their site, leading to an encroachment on the Particular Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result places are subject to rigorous controls beneath European and Irish environmental legislation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments might have Long lasting ecological consequences, specially within a delicate coastal surroundings which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, which can be partly built, is in the correct place. Their authorized workforce has characterised the action being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their perspective, an allegation that's been recurring in court docket and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal preparing disputes, wherever views of the sea are equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded through waistline-large water for the duration of a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances, a picture which has due to the fact come to be emblematic from the intensity of your dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they ended up meant to Collect visual evidence on the wall’s place relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how the two Adult males entered the h2o throughout significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm drinking water to photograph the website became The most placing descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely observed that these types of actions have been cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into a region impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was staying encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 Jan 2026 ended up lined in detail by the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 became greatly searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the history and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard even further submissions on no matter whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt development pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute while in the legal timeline.
At the Main in the dispute is really a disagreement over boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain that the wall, as constructed, goes outside of what was authorised and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is referred to as meticulous in his evaluation of arranging files, maps, and circumstances connected into the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their motion is inspired by concern for environmental protection and adherence to preparing law. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A personal perspective, insisting rather that it is about making sure that improvement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've explained their extensive-standing link to the realm and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few merely trying to establish a relatives residence in accordance With all the regulation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Specific Region of Conservation and say that each one will work are actually carried out depending on Skilled guidance and accredited plans. Their legal professionals have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with getting into The ocean through a storm, will not change the fundamental details.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than building of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for the predicament that lots of observers see as ever more widespread. As sea concentrations rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions posting about René Collier observed which the businessman had Earlier been linked to regional advocacy on preparing and environmental difficulties, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty various Qualified backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, have grown to be synonymous While using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site in the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-substantial drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances and René Collier waded by means of midsection-significant water throughout a storm to photograph the website Irish Times are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting both of those the Bodily reality of your coastline along with the symbolic nature on the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these steps shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an too much method.
As being the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains uncertain. The courtroom ought to figure out whether the wall as created complies with scheduling authorization and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging ailments. Still the human aspect continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Stay alongside one another prolonged following the legal expenses have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction will work at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case prolong past that address. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the value of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. Furthermore, it underscores how quickly a local disagreement can escalate when basic concerns for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of purely natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre on the dispute stands partially developed, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful issues. No matter if it's going to in the long run be altered, taken out, or finished as prepared will rely on the court docket’s results. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will most likely go on to seem in headlines, joined indelibly to Just about the most intently viewed organizing disputes in north Dublin recently.